While our economy has mostly been shut down for the past couple of months, many of our parks and green spaces have remained open to allow people to maintain some sort of normalcy and physical and mental health. In the coming months, it is evident that the “new normal” will take its toll on how we spend our time outdoors and enjoy our green spaces. Accordingly, this will require our local authorities to better regulate park usage and invest in their quality and accessibility.
A Zencity analysis of nearly 2M resident discourse data points from 80 cities across the US indicates that conversations about ‘parks’ are becoming more significant as the COVID-19 pandemic progresses. As shown in the chart below, the average share of discourse¹ about parks doubled from February to March and then doubled again from March to April – an overall surge of about 400%.
The nature of these conversations (no pun intended, but maybe a little bit) can be segmented into the following subtopics:
The sentiment distribution of these conversations over time points to a decrease in positive park-related discourse, with the most significant decrease (of 9 percentage points) evident between March and April. Nonetheless, both these data sets show that citizens across the nation are concerned about parks and open spaces and expect their cities to find the right balance between protecting them and enabling them to enjoy the outdoors.
There is no doubt by now that our parks and open spaces will play a critical role in the global recovery process from the coronavirus pandemic (see NRPA’s path to recovery guidelines as an example). Parks, and even the abundance of tree canopy, have long been praised for their physical and mental health benefits. Many of the more well-known urban parks were originally planned for health purposes, providing refuge and fresh(er) air to city dwellers as ‘urbanscapes’ went through heavy industrialization. A more recent cost-benefit analysis of investment in parks and open trails found that every dollar spent on creating and maintaining park trails saves about $3 in healthcare expenses, a ratio that is now potentially growing.
As current research draws more and more correlation between air pollution and the severity of the disease outbreak, the importance of providing residents with better-quality green and open spaces is resurfacing. In response, cities must act fast and lead adaptive park management initiatives and policies. They also need to allocate part of their recovery funding to support better parks and green spaces as vital urban infrastructure in the future.
Releasing clear guidelines and highlighting regulations on using parks and green spaces during this time is paramount. This messaging should be available and visible as part of a city’s communication plan and in its parks. Cities can get creative with delivering their messaging to help increase visibility and engagement. For example, Pittsburgh created a visually appealing infographic for its residents. NRPA and the World Urban Parks Program have also collected other great examples from which cities can draw inspiration. Providing hand washing and sanitation stations in and around parks, as did the city of Asheville and Victoria, may also contribute to maintaining people’s hygiene while outdoors as long as they can be carefully maintained so they don’t become a hygienic hazard.
In cities such as Los Angeles, overcrowding of open spaces and non-compliance with such guidelines unfortunately forced the city to shut down most of them. This led many Angelinos to flock to nearby cities and brought up the need for unified regional and even mega-regional policies to protect residents and reduce infections. This notion of regulating and monitoring the movement of people within and between states should consider people’s inevitable need to enjoy the outdoors and green space available to them.
However, it is essential to consider the potential that shutting down green spaces to stop the spread could be harmful in the medium to long run. “People are realizing what we’ve been saying all along: that parks are not nice to have; parks are must-haves. Parks are essential services,” said Phil Ginsburg, GM at San Francisco Recreation and Parks, in a recent webinar. This growth in demand is leading local authorities to decide not to shut down their parks, to act fast, and to provide residents with a supply of more open space to use, starting within and around their green spaces.
Cities such as Portland, Vancouver, Denver, and Cleavland have all closed off some of their parks to car traffic, allowing for more walking, jogging, and cycling space, desperately needed to avoid overcrowding. For the time being, other cities have reclaimed entire roads from cars as part of the effort to enable better physical distancing. In Paris, Mayor Hidalgo intends to make this “new normal” – the long-term normal, as is the city of Milan.
Several cities have also repurposed some of their park facilities to support current needs. In Los Angeles, 42 park centers accommodate 6,000 shelter beds for the homeless and function as temporary quarantine areas. In San Francisco, recreation centers were turned into childcare facilities for low-income families and healthcare workers during the pandemic.
As mentioned before, accessibility to green spaces is key in this equation. According to the Trust for Public Land, across the U.S., 100 million people do not have access to a park within a 10-minute walk from their home – a number the organization and its partners are strongly advocating to reduce, especially now. In NYC, the Parks Without Borders program, set off back in the pandemic-free world of 2015, now becomes even more needed than before. The program aims to increase accessibility to green spaces by extending the beauty of parks into surrounding communities and transforming underused spaces in their vicinity.
Cities such as Philadelphia and whole regions such as Ontario, Canada, have deemed community gardens and urban farms essential during COVID-19 as part of the understanding that not everyone has immediate access to a big park. These declarations are, of course, coupled with regulations to keep physical distancing in place.
To further enhance accessibility, this is also the time to promote and invest in more creative and unusual green spaces. Green roofs, public-private spaces between buildings, plazas and intersections, parking lots, and parking spaces can all be repurposed, whether temporarily or permanently, to accommodate the lack of adequate green space. These initiatives aren’t novel; they are simply more critical now than before when our neighborhoods need to provide us with most of our needs. Cities and their community partners need to invest in promoting these ideas as part of their recovery plans.
Finally, our ultimate goal should be to look at the design and planning of our cities and parks through a public health lens. In London, a masterplan for healthy streets was devised long before the pandemic hit and will now be promoted faster. It emphasizes quality public spaces and streets, prioritizing pedestrians and cyclists while incorporating natural and green infrastructure. Our urban parks and greenways have always played a part in the support system for our physical and mental health and wellbeing. They will continue to do so after this pandemic if we invest in their availability and accessibility and design them to be usable and adaptable to such scenarios.
As local government leaders continue to discuss the reopening of services, businesses, and public spaces in the wake of COVID-19, residents continue to express confusion and a need for clear and concise communication. Recently, Zencity analyzed resident discourse on the topic of reopening. For actionable insights on the matter, read the full report.
If you would like to learn more about how Zencity’s 130+ city/county network is leveraging our technology to handle COVID-19 response management and using its insights to make informed decisions as new virus regulations emerge, visit our Coronavirus Action Plan Page.
The variable “average share of discourse” describes the volume of discourse in a way that is not affected by the varied levels of discourse in cities of different sizes.