Embarking on our exploration of trust within smart urban governance, the report "Solving for Trust: Innovations in Smart Urban Governance" by Eric Gordon and Tomás Guarna serves as an illuminating guide, delving into the complex challenges faced by public-sector institutions in rebuilding and fortifying trust. Let's navigate through the three chapters, each unraveling a distinct facet of trust-building in the contemporary landscape.
Chapter 1: Trust-Building Strategies in Governance:
In the initial chapter, the authors delve into the complex challenges associated with distrust. They highlight the inconsistencies in diagnosing the trust problem among city leaders. While the acknowledgment of a lack of trust is universal, the root causes vary. Some attribute it to the perception of the government's incapability in facilitating reliable transactions, while others view it as a result of a misalignment of values with constituents. Interestingly, these diverse diagnoses do not necessarily dictate the solutions pursued by governments.
The technological solutions presented in this chapter can be categorized into two groups—those focused on bolstering the reputational value of the institution and those aimed at enhancing the reputational value of human or nonhuman representatives. The strategies explored, such as trust-by-proxy through social media influencers or blockchain technology, demonstrate a nuanced approach to addressing the intricate trust deficit.
Bottom line - Strat from the problem, not the solution:
City leaders are encouraged to connect interventions to diagnoses, ensuring clarity in problem-solving strategies. Civic technology interventions should be part of broader trust-building strategies, aligning with the nature of the identified trust problem.
Chapter 2: Affective Qualities in Trust-Building:
In the second chapter, the exploration is heightened as the authors delve into the affective qualities underpinning constituent trust. They stress that trust-building strategies aim to establish perceived proximity between the institution and the constituent. These strategies can be classified as either reducing time or reducing distance. The emphasis on reducing time centers around efficiency and streamlined transactions, while reducing distance involves the creation of relatable institutions or proxies that evoke a sense of intimacy and comfort. The chapter underscores the significance of maintaining a balance among technology familiarity, institutional identity, and user trust, offering insightful perspectives on the intricate nuances involved in trust-building.
Bottom line - Pay attention to proxies:
City leaders are advised to think critically about proxies, paying attention to the connection between trust relationships developed with human or machine proxies and the institution. Mindful exploration and consideration of potential problems associated with proxies are crucial.
Chapter 3: Listening for Democracy:
The third chapter focuses on the communicative relationship between trustors and trustees within institutions, highlighting the paramount importance of listening. The authors identify two primary modalities of listening—closed-system listening and open-ended listening.
Closed-system listening involves seeking specific information directed neatly to decision-making, while open-ended listening involves seeking input and analysis prior to establishing decision-making agendas. This chapter emphasizes that public engagement goals are better characterized as goals of better listening. Thought leadership is evident in the exploration of digital technologies like coUrbanize and Decidim, serving as tools for effective and inclusive listening.
Bottom line - you gotta trust the technology you're using
City leaders are encouraged to critically explore the use of AI in creating proximity understanding the desirable nature of relationships in digital concierge or human proxies. Attention to the relationship between technology, trust, and sustainability is crucial.
Conclusion: Charting the Course for Trust:
From the diverse diagnoses of trust problems among city leaders to the nuanced exploration of technological solutions, the report calls for a strategic alignment of interventions with identified trust issues. The emphasis on affective qualities in trust-building and the delicate balance between technology familiarity, institutional identity, and user trust provide crucial guidance.
As city leaders navigate the evolving landscape of smart urban governance, the report serves as a compass, steering towards a future where trust is not only rebuilt but sustained through thoughtful strategies and technological innovations.
How City Leaders Can Get Started:
- Connect interventions to diagnoses: Clearly articulate the nature of the trust problem before discussing solutions.
- Think critically about proxies: Pay attention to the connection between trust relationships developed with proxies and the institution.
- Critically explore the use of AI in creating proximity: Understand the desirable nature of relationships in digital concierge or human proxies.
- All technology has values; know yours: Represent city values in digital interfaces for user understanding.
- How data storage gets communicated matters: Communicate about data storage and mobility with clarity.
- Disaggregate "the public" carefully: Acknowledge the diversity within the public and avoid assuming a homogenous audience.
- Listen smartly: Invest in pervasive listening to align institutional values with those of the constituency. Recognize listening technologies as public goods, fostering inclusivity rather than monopolizing by government officials.
%20copy-1.png?width=544&height=120&name=Logo_black%20(1)%20copy-1.png "ZenCcty logo"){kind=logo}
